Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inShirbagi, Naser
TitelIranian University Teachers' and Students' Views on Effectiveness of Students' Evaluation of Teaching
QuelleIn: Quality of Higher Education, 8 (2011), S.118-131 (14 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1822-1645
SchlagwörterHigher Education; Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance; Faculty Evaluation; Likert Scales; Program Effectiveness; Foreign Countries; Evaluation Methods; Teaching Experience; Student Attitudes; Teacher Attitudes; Questionnaires; Statistical Significance; Evaluation Research; Evaluation Problems; Robustness (Statistics); Teacher Effectiveness; Error of Measurement; Program Attitudes; Iran
AbstractThe main purpose of this research is to examine the effectiveness of Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) from a sample of university teachers' and students' view. The study adopts exploratory descriptive design. Participants of this research were 300 teachers and 600 graduate students from 3 Iranian higher education institutions. A 30-item format questionnaire was the main instrument for data collection. Responses to the items were made on a five-point "Likert" scale anchored with "strongly agree" and "strongly disagree." Results show that "Cronbach alpha" coefficients of measures are in satisfactory level (0.86 for teachers' version and 0.88 for students' version). There are statistically significant differences among teachers and students based on gender, teaching experience, tenure and major. The teachers highly agreed with using different evaluation methods (e.g., peers evaluation, self-evaluation, and administrators) instead of merely relay on Student evaluation of teaching method. The study presents a challenge to the use of SET in higher education system in Iran and, in particular, raises questions about fairness if such ratings are to be used in decisions relating to employment issues. The findings suggest that SET should be applied cautiously in faculty performance evaluation. (Contains 6 tables and 2 footnotes.) (As Provided).
AnmerkungenVytautas Magnus University, Centre for Quality of Studies. South Daukanto g. 27-314, Kaunas, LT-44249, Lithuania. Tel: +370-37-327973; Fax: +370-37-327973; e-mail: zur+amk@skc.vdu.lt; Web site: http://www.vdu.lt/skc
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2017/4/10
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Quality of Higher Education" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: