Agricultural Extension Services and Market Regulation: Learning from a Comparison of Six EU Countries

Autor/inn/en	Laurent, Catherine; Cerf, Marianne; Labarthe, Pierre
Titel	Agricultural Extension Services and Market Regulation: Learning from a Comparison of Six EU Countries
Quelle	In: Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 12 (2006) 1, S.5-16 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1389-224X
Schlagwörter	Knowledge Level; Rural Extension; Foreign Countries; Agriculture; Rural Development; Agricultural Occupations; Technical Assistance; Social Systems; Competition; Public Policy; Comparative Analysis; France; Germany; Greece; Netherlands; Spain; United Kingdom + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Wissensbasis; Ausland; Landwirtschaft; Rural environment; Development; Ländliches Milieu; Entwicklung; Agriculture; Occupation; Beruf; Landwirtschaftlicher Beruf; Technische Hilfe; Social system; Soziales System; Wettkampf; Öffentliche Ordnung; Frankreich; Deutschland; Griechenland; Niederlande; Spanien; Großbritannien
Abstract	If farmers are to meet the new challenges facing agriculture (environment, rural development, etc.), appropriate knowledge has to be produced. But observations in six EU countries (France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK) show that unexpected problems arise when technical support for agriculture is linked to market regulation, as recommended since the late 1980s. The source of these problems can be understood better by applying concepts from the service economy: i) The production of new knowledge requires strong interaction between service providers (technical support bodies) and beneficiaries (farmers). The weakening of non-market regulation procedures, which partly guaranteed these possibilities of interaction, makes the conception of an advisory service difficult. ii) As soon as consultancy becomes a paying service, some beneficiaries reduce technical interaction with their colleagues in order to benefit from a productive advantage, and the "multipliable" nature of new knowledge is reduced. iii) An increasing number of farmers are excluded from the benefits of technical support even though they help to provide services that society expects from agriculture (management of the land, maintenance of activities in low-density areas). iv) The responsibility for combining contradictory requirements (competitiveness, environment, rural development) is most often put on the shoulders of individual farmers who are unequipped to deal with such complex issues. Observed trends attest to the fact that effects often run counter to the stated agricultural and rural development objectives of policies. (Contains 3 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10