Online Peer Assessment in an Inservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Education Course

Autor/inn/en	Wen, Meichun Lydia; Tsai, Chin-Chung
Titel	Online Peer Assessment in an Inservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Education Course
Quelle	In: Teaching in Higher Education, 13 (2008) 1, S.55-67 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1356-2517
Schlagwörter	Teacher Education Curriculum; Education Courses; Peer Evaluation; Research Methodology; Feedback (Response); Program Effectiveness; Science Teachers; Mathematics Teachers; Teaching Methods; Inservice Teacher Education; Computer Assisted Testing; Internet; Educational Technology; Masters Theses; Graduate Study; Teacher Attitudes; Interrater Reliability; Foreign Countries; Creativity; Relevance (Education); Group Activities; Taiwan + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Fortbildungskurs; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Science; Teacher; Teachers; Science teacher; Wissenschaft; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Mathematics; Mathematik; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Lehrerfortbildung; Unterrichtsmedien; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Lehrerverhalten; Interrater-Reliabilität; Ausland; Kreativität; Relevance; Relevanz; Gruppenaktivität
Abstract	Online or web-based peer assessment is a valuable and effective way to help the learner to examine his or her learning progress, and teachers need to be familiar with the practice before they use it in their classrooms. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to design an online peer assessment activity for 37 inservice science and mathematics teachers. The teachers were divided into 12 groups, and each group was required to present a master's thesis proposal at the end of a research methods course. Each participant gave feedback and ratings to several group projects during a three-round online peer assessment activity. Two instructors' scores and peers' scores were in low to medium correlation. The quality of group projects and participants' feedback improved, but a decrease in attitudes toward peer assessment was found. The results of the study are discussed and implications are provided. (Contains 5 tables and 1 figure.) (Author).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/default.html
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10