Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Papanthymou, Anastasia; Darra, Maria |
---|---|
Titel | Quality in Higher Education: Defining the Conceptual Contents and Their Relative Predominance |
Quelle | In: Higher Education Studies, 12 (2022) 4, S.18-36 (19 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1925-4741 |
Schlagwörter | Educational Quality; Higher Education; Definitions; Classification; Educational Environment; Course Content; Learning Processes; Students; Teachers; Student Centered Learning; Curriculum Development; Caring; Daily Living Skills; Teaching Methods; Student Evaluation; Feedback (Response); Student Participation; Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Faculty Development Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Begriffsbestimmung; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Lernumgebung; Pädagogische Umwelt; Schulumwelt; Kursprogramm; Learning process; Lernprozess; Student; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Group work; Student-entered learning; Student-centred learning; Student centred learning; Schülerorientierter Unterricht; Schülerzentrierter Unterricht; Gruppenarbeit; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Care; Pflege; Sorge; Betreuung; Alltagsfertigkeit; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Schülermitarbeit; Schülermitwirkung; Studentische Mitbestimmung; Pädagogische Kompetenz |
Abstract | The purpose of this study is to investigate the conceptual content of the term "quality" in higher education, as it emerges from the descriptions and discussions of authors, researchers, and experts in 22 scientific publications. The analysis of the qualitative data is based on the methodology of grounded theory. From the analysis, 21 major dimensions or characteristics of quality in higher education emerged due to their high frequency of occurrence, were subdivided into five broader categories: "learning environment", "learning content", "processes", "students", and "teachers". According to the main findings, from the "learning environment" category, the dimension concerning psychosocial elements predominated in the literature. From the category "learning content", two dimensions prevailed (student-centred teaching and learning) and the dimension concerning taking an interest in and caring about students. From the "processes" category, the dimension concerning assessment prevailed. In the category "students", the dimension of improved learning outcomes was the most frequently observed, and finally, from the "teachers" category, two dimensions prevailed over the others, one concerning pedagogical skills and the other termed skills: emotional, management, reflection. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Canadian Center of Science and Education. 1595 Sixteenth Ave Suite 301, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3N9 Canada. Tel: 416-642-2606; Fax: 416-642-2608; e-mail: hes@ccsenet.org; Web site: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |