Historical and Legal Considerations in Development of a For-Credit Internship Program

Autor/inn/en	Zumbach Harken, Nichole; Price-Williams, Shelley
Titel	Historical and Legal Considerations in Development of a For-Credit Internship Program
Quelle	In: Journal of Experiential Education, 45 (2022) 4, S.477-492 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Zumbach Harken, Nichole)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1053-8259
DOI	10.1177/10538259221081669
Schlagwörter	Program Development; Internship Programs; Educational History; Court Litigation; Legal Responsibility; Higher Education; College Credits; Experiential Learning; Labor Legislation; Work Environment; Bullying; Student Placement; Supervision; Instructional Materials; Equal Opportunities (Jobs); Assignments; Guidelines; Evaluation; School Policy; College Faculty + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Programmplanung; Berufspraktische Ausbildung; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Rechtsstreit; Strafmündigkeit; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; College; Colleges; Achievement; Performance; Anrechnung; Hochschule; Fachhochschule; Leistung; Experiental learning; Erfahrungsorientiertes Lernen; Labor law; Arbeitsrecht; Arbeitsmilieu; Mobbing; Schülerpraktikum; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Equal opportunity; Equal opportunities; Job; Jobs; Chancengleichheit; Beruf; Assignment; Auftrag; Zuweisung; Richtlinien; Evaluierung; Schulpolitik; Fakultät
Abstract	Background: This research outlines important factors in the development of a for-credit internship program by providing a historical context of internship work dating back to the original case of "Walling v. Portland Terminal" (1947), which outlined acceptable non-paid work of trainees, to more current applications of these labor laws in "Wang v. Hearst" (2016) and "Glatt v. Foxlight Pictures" (2016) then connects those legal precedents with current research in best practices. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to examine legal implications on for-credit internship programs and create recommendations based on United States law. Methodology/Approach: This work uses peer-reviewed research to support recommendation in internship development, implementation, and evaluation. Findings/Conclusions: Recommendations for programmatic implementation are made to avoid potential litigation against higher education institutions, faculty, staff, students, and internship placement organizations. Implications: These legal cases inform higher education and considerations in change to organizational policies and practices as it relates to fair labor, program development, and oversight of experiential education. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01