'Measuring a Plant Doesn't Help It to Grow': Teacher's Perspectives on the Standards Agenda in England

Autor/inn/en	Jopling, Michael; Williams-Brown, Zeta
Titel	'Measuring a Plant Doesn't Help It to Grow': Teacher's Perspectives on the Standards Agenda in England
Quelle	In: Education 3-13, 49 (2021) 2, S.227-240 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0300-4279
DOI	10.1080/03004279.2020.1717573
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Elementary School Teachers; Teacher Attitudes; Standards; Student Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Tests; Special Needs Students; Students with Disabilities; Test Use; Well Being; Barriers; Program Implementation; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Elementary school; Teacher; Teachers; Grundschule; Volksschule; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Lehrerverhalten; Standard; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Examination; Prüfung; Examen; Sonderpädagogischer Förderbedarf; Student; Students; Disability; Disabilities; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Behinderung; Testanwendung; Well-being; Wellness; Wohlbefinden
Abstract	This paper reflects on the findings of two studies focused on teachers' perspectives on the standards agenda. The original study was carried out in 2010-2011 and published in 2015 in Education 3-13 [Brown, Z., and K. Manktelow. 2015. "'Perspectives on the Standards Agenda: Exploring the Agenda's Impact on Primary Teachers' Professional Identities." Education 3-13 44 (1): 1-13]. The study was replicated in 2019 using the same methods to see if perspectives had changed almost a decade later. Q-methodology was used with UK primary school teachers to find commonalities of perspectives across the sample that may not have been apparent had more traditional data collection methods been used. The findings show that there remains a variation in perspectives on whether the standards outcomes provide constraint or flexibility. Teachers continue to hold negative positions and are frustrated by the importance placed on Statutory Assessment Tests (SATs). There was more resistance in the 2019 study to how the standards agenda has been translated into policy and the impact the tests have on children, especially those with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities. The paper concludes by critiquing the enduring use of SATs and suggests that the standards outcomes need to be rebalanced by focusing first and foremost on the wellbeing of all children. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01