"Educational Goods" and the Ethical Dimensions of Educational Policy and Practice

Autor/in	Curren, Randall
Titel	"Educational Goods" and the Ethical Dimensions of Educational Policy and Practice
Quelle	In: Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54 (2020) 5, S.1375-1381 (7 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Curren, Randall)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0309-8249
DOI	10.1111/1467-9752.12510
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Educational Policy; Educational Practices; Educational Objectives; Decision Making; Evidence Based Practice; Program Implementation + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Bildungspraxis; Educational objective; Bildungsziel; Erziehungsziel; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung
Abstract	This essay is a commentary on Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb and Swift's "Educational Goods: Values, Evidence, and Decision-Making." It discusses the book's conceptualisation of childhood goods, and it comments at length on its place within the larger philosophical enterprise of promoting normatively and evidentially sound decision-making in education. A thesis of the commentary is that the book provides an important form of orientation to educational policy decision-making, but that the goods and distributive values it identifies would need to be supplemented in order to adequately address aspects of educational practice beyond the kinds of policy matters it discusses. These would include the content of education, the scope and division of educational authority, and the manner in which such authority should be exercised, for example pedagogically, in shaping student conduct, and in communicating and implementing educational policies. [For "Educational Goods: Values, Evidence, and Decision-Making," see ED592596.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01