Decision-Making Styles of Chinese Business Students

Autor/inn/en	Ding, Ning; Xu, Xiaoyan; Yang, Huipu; Li, Yanhong; van Heughten, Petra
Titel	Decision-Making Styles of Chinese Business Students
Quelle	In: Journal of Education for Business, 95 (2020) 6, S.351-358 (8 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0883-2323
DOI	10.1080/08832323.2019.1654968
Schlagwörter	Business Administration Education; Decision Making; Entrepreneurship; Measures (Individuals); Student Attitudes; Gender Differences; Student Characteristics; Educational Change; International Trade; Prior Learning; Instructional Design; Sex Stereotypes; Universities; College Students + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Unternehmungsgeist; Messdaten; Schülerverhalten; Geschlechterkonflikt; Bildungsreform; Trade; International relations; Handel; Internationale Beziehungen; Vorkenntnisse; Lesson concept; Lessonplan; Unterrichtsentwurf; University; Universität; Collegestudent
Abstract	Assessing decision-making styles of business students is crucial, particularly in China, because the government increasingly encourages business graduates to establish their own businesses as startups. The authors' aim was to employ both the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire and General Decision-Making Style measure to investigate whether differences exist in terms of decision-making styles between students with and without business experience, and whether gender is a moderating factor. The findings will assist in curriculum reform of business education in Chinese universities. More attention should be paid to training students' decision-making styles, especially the rational style for students without business experience. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2022/1/01