Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Smith, Neil; Caldwell, Helen; Richards, Mike; Bandara, Arosha |
---|---|
Titel | A Comparison of MOOC Development and Delivery Approaches |
Quelle | In: International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34 (2017) 2, S.152-164 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2056-4880 |
DOI | 10.1108/IJILT-09-2016-0047 |
Schlagwörter | Online Courses; Delivery Systems; Comparative Analysis; Instructional Development; Intermode Differences; Distance Education; Electronic Learning; Audience Analysis; Teaching Methods; Database Management Systems; Computer Security; Information Security; Handheld Devices; College Programs; Foreign Countries; United Kingdom |
Abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a comparison of two ways of developing and delivering massive open online courses (MOOCs). One was developed by The Open University in collaboration with FutureLearn; the other was developed independently by a small team at the Northampton University. Design/methodology/approach: The different approaches had very different profiles of pedagogic flexibility, cost, development processes, institutional support and participant numbers. Findings: MOOCs on existing large platforms can reach thousands of people, but constrain pedagogical choice. Self-made MOOCs have smaller audiences but can target them more effectively. Originality/value: This comparison shows that, several years after MOOCs became prominent, there are many viable approaches for MOOCs. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |