Characterizing the Use of Research-Community Partnerships in Studies of Evidence-Based Interventions in Children's Community Services

Autor/inn/en	Frazee-Brookman, Lauren; Stahmer, Aubyn; Stadnick, Nicole; Chlebowski, Colby; Herschel, Amy; Garland, Ann F.
Titel	Characterizing the Use of Research-Community Partnerships in Studies of Evidence-Based Interventions in Children's Community Services
Quelle	(2015), (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext (1); PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei (2) Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0894-587X
DOI	10.1007/s10488-014-0622-9
Schlagwörter	Best Practices; Intervention; Delivery Systems; Agency Cooperation; Researchers; Models; Interpersonal Relationship; Cooperative Planning; Community Services; Stakeholders; Child Health; Mental Health; Online Surveys; Community Programs; Program Content; Statistical Analysis; Qualitative Research; Coding; Research Projects; Mental Disorders; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Role; Likert Scales + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Auslieferung; Researcher; Forscher; Analogiemodell; Interpersonal relation; Interpersonal relations; Interpersonelle Beziehung; Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Gemeindenahe Versorgung; Psychohygiene; Programmgestaltung; Statistische Analyse; Qualitative Forschung; Codierung; Programmierung; Forschungsvorhaben; Mental illness; Geisteskrankheit; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Rollen; Likert-Skala
Abstract	This study characterized the use of research community partnerships (RCPs) to tailor evidence-based intervention, training, and implementation models for delivery across different childhood problems and service contexts using a survey completed by project principal investigators and community partners. To build on previous RCP research and to explicate the tacit knowledge gained through collaborative efforts, the following were examined: (1) characteristics of studies using RCP models; (2) RCP functioning, processes, and products; (3) processes of tailoring evidence-based practices for community implementation; and (4) perceptions of the benefits and challenges of collaborating with community providers and consumers. Results indicated that researchers were solely or jointly involved in the formation of almost all of the RCPs; interpersonal and operational processes were perceived as primary challenges; community partners' roles included greater involvement in implementation and participant recruitment than more traditional research activities; and the partnership process was perceived to increase the relevance and ''fit'' of interventions and research. [This article from "Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research" was published online Jan 13, 2015.] (As Provided).
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01