Minnesota Tech Prep Consortia Evaluation System. 1993/94 Cohort Self-Assessment Summary Report.

Autor/inn/en	Brown, James M.; Pucel, David J.
Institution	Minnesota Univ., St. Paul. Minnesota Research and Development Center for Vocational Education.
Titel	Minnesota Tech Prep Consortia Evaluation System. 1993/94 Cohort Self-Assessment Summary Report.
Quelle	(1995), (89 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Articulation (Education); Consortia; Curriculum; Educational Assessment; High Schools; Integrated Curriculum; Marketing; Postsecondary Education; Professional Development; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Pupil Personnel Services; School Business Relationship; School Counseling; Self Evaluation (Groups); State Programs; Statewide Planning; Student Evaluation; Student Personnel Services; Tech Prep; Minnesota + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Articulation; Artikulation (Ling); Artikulation; Aussprache; Vereinigung; Curricula; Lehrplan; Rahmenplan; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; High school; Oberschule; Post-secondary education; Tertiäre Bildung; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; School counselling; Pädagogische Beratung; Self evaluation; Group; Groups; Selbstevaluation; Gruppe (Soz); Regierungsprogramm; Planwirtschaft; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Dualsystem
Abstract	This report summarizes the comprehensive, written self-assessments comleted by seven Minnesota tech prep consortia. The 1993-94 cohort of consortia was the first group to use the self-assessment. Within each tech prep consortium, the evaluation was completed by cross-district teams of teachers, administrators, and others who had been trained by the Minnesota Research and Development Center for Vocational Education. The summary is divided into four sections: curriculum and instruction, marketing, student assessment, and evaluation. Each section includes descriptions of the following areas: overall planning, staff development, special populations, curriculum integration, articulation, partnerships, evaluation, and retrospective. The report also contains the results of a brainstorming session in which participants shared successful and unsuccessful practices related to each section of tech prep. (KC)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC