An Evaluation of Non-Formal Education in Ecuador. Volume 2: Overview and Evaluation Plan. Final Report.

Autor/inn/en	Laosa, Luis M.; und weitere
Institution	California Univ., Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation.
Titel	An Evaluation of Non-Formal Education in Ecuador. Volume 2: Overview and Evaluation Plan. Final Report.
Quelle	(1975), (98 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Attitudes; Change Agents; Control Groups; Educational Games; Educational Objectives; Evaluation Methods; Experimental Groups; Instructional Materials; Literacy; Mathematical Concepts; Measurement Instruments; Nonformal Education; Personnel Selection; Program Evaluation; Quality Control; Rural Areas; Ecuador + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Attitude; Einstellung; Verhalten; Educational game; Lernspiel; Educational objective; Bildungsziel; Erziehungsziel; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Alphabetisierung; Schreib- und Lesefähigkeit; Non-formal education; Non formal education; Nichtformale Bildung; Personalauswahl; Personalentscheidung; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Qualitätskontrolle; Rural area; Ländlicher Raum
Abstract	As the second volume in a 4-volume evaluation report on the University of Massachusetts Non-Formal Education Project (UMass NFEP) in rural Ecuador, this volume details the evaluation design. Cited as basic to the evaluation design are questions which ask: (1) What kinds of effects (changes) can be observed? and (2) What are characteristics of the materials and procedures as they can be logically and/or empirically related to the desirable outcomes? Cited as major components of the design are: (1) The experimental field implementation and concurrent evaluation of the UMass NFEP education games that were among the most widely used/accepted education games; and (2) The UMass non-formal education intervention impact study (an impact profile, a qualitative analysis of intervention based on observations and interviews, and individual testing of game session participants). Additionally, this report describes: (1) Materials Selected for University of California at Los Angeles Field Implementation and Evaluation; (2) Instruments (a set of individually administered tests given in a pre-second-post basis to measure literacy, numerical skills, and critical consciousness or attitudes); (3) Staffing (selection criteria, training, and procedures); (4) Implementation Procedures (selection of communities and control and experimental groups); (5) Criteria for Field Supervision and Quality Control. (JC)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC