The Second Annual Report of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 School Year 1966-67.

Institution	Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC.
Titel	The Second Annual Report of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 School Year 1966-67.
Quelle	(1967), (139 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Academic Achievement; Annual Reports; Attendance; Compensatory Education; Delinquency; Disadvantaged; Disadvantaged Youth; Dropouts; Expenditures; Federal Programs; Federal State Relationship; Handicapped Children; Higher Education; Migrant Children; Private Schools; Racial Segregation; School Role; Special Programs; State Programs; Statistical Data; Teacher Aides; Teacher Role; Urban Areas + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Schulleistung; Annual report; Tätigkeitsbericht; Anwesenheit; Kompensatorischer Unterricht; Kriminalität; Benachteiligter Jugendlicher; Drop-out; Drop-outs; Dropout; Early leavers; Schulversagen; Ausgaben; Bund-Länder-Beziehung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Private school; Privatschule; Rassentrennung; Sonderpädagogische Förderung; Regierungsprogramm; Handreichung; Lehrerhilfe; Lehrerrolle; Urban area; Stadtregion
Abstract	This report overviews and summarizes the findings of studies of nationwide Title I programs during the 1966-67 school year. It has been found that there were increases in expenditures for instructional services and the purchase of equipment, and more States invested in the programs than during the previous year. To explain the effect of the programs, in separate sections the report discusses the educational and socioeconomic background of the participating disadvantaged students, and examines specifically the nature of schools in urban areas. One section presents the findings of a study of the effect of Title I on reading and arithmetic achievement as measured by standardized tests (Dayton Study), and another presents brief digests of the annual reports of the programs in the individual states, which highlight their major achievements and exemplary projects. A new survey instrument for obtaining data on Title I participants during their third year of operation is also briefly described. Extensive appendixes and charts and tables offer specific data. (EF)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC