Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Tierney, William G.; Corwin, Zoe Blumberg |
|---|---|
| Titel | The Tensions between Academic Freedom and Institutional Review Boards |
| Quelle | In: Qualitative Inquiry, 13 (2007) 3, S.388-398 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1077-8004 |
| DOI | 10.1177/1077800406297655 |
| Schlagwörter | Research Design; Academic Freedom; Ethics; Administrative Principles; Governing Boards; Quality Circles; Quality Control; Research Administration; Research Problems; Position Papers; Barriers; Conflict; Organizational Climate; Organizational Culture |
| Abstract | Academic freedom and the protection of human research subjects are central tenets of American universities. Academic freedom protects the rights of tenured professors to conduct autonomous research; human subject protection ensures that research causes as minimal a risk as possible to study participants. Although the two principles are mutually exclusive, recent trends in Institutional Review Board jurisdiction have placed the two principles in increasing conflict with one another. This article outlines three ways in which Institutional Review Boards potentially infringe on academic freedom: (a) by regulating who is required to consent to research, (b) by stipulating the type of questions allowed and location of research interactions, and (c) by limiting research design. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
