Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Armstrong, Patrick Ian; Vogel, David L. |
---|---|
Titel | Theoretical and Methodological Issues with Testing the SCCT and RIASEC Models: Comment on Lent, Sheu, and Brown (2010) and Lubinski (2010) |
Quelle | In: Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57 (2010) 2, S.239-247 (9 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0022-0167 |
DOI | 10.1037/a0019177 |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Self Efficacy; Career Choice; Theory Practice Relationship; Cognitive Ability; Research Methodology; Vocational Interests; Personality Traits; Expectation; Learning Experience; Models; Social Cognition; Individual Differences Self-efficacy; Selbstwirksamkeit; Theorie-Praxis-Beziehung; Denkfähigkeit; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Berufsinteresse; Individual characteristics; Personality characteristic; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Expectancy; Erwartung; Lernerfahrung; Analogiemodell; Soziale Kognition; Individueller Unterschied |
Abstract | The current article replies to comments made by Lent, Sheu, and Brown (2010) and Lubinski (2010) regarding the study "Interpreting the Interest-Efficacy Association From a RIASEC Perspective" (Armstrong & Vogel, 2009). The comments made by Lent et al. and Lubinski highlight a number of important theoretical and methodological issues, including the process of defining and differentiating between constructs, the assumptions underlying Holland's (1959, 1997) RIASEC (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional types) model and interrelations among constructs specified in social cognitive career theory (SCCT), the importance of incremental validity for evaluating constructs, and methodological considerations when quantifying interest-efficacy correlations and for comparing models using multivariate statistical methods. On the basis of these comments and previous research on the SCCT and Holland models, we highlight the importance of considering multiple theoretical perspectives in vocational research and practice. Alternative structural models are outlined for examining the role of interests, self-efficacy, learning experiences, outcome expectations, personality, and cognitive abilities in the career choice and development process. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 3 footnotes.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |