An Economist's Perspective on Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010)

Autor/in	Imbens, Guido W.
Titel	An Economist's Perspective on Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010)
Quelle	In: Psychological Methods, 15 (2010) 1, S.47-55 (9 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1082-989X
DOI	10.1037/a0018538
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Economics; Research Methodology; Causal Models; Inferences; Supply and Demand; Selection; Consumer Economics; Regression (Statistics); Statistical Analysis; Validity; Observation + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Volkswirtschaftslehre; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Kausalanalyse; Inference; Inferenz; Bedarfsplanung; Auslese; Konsumökonomie; Regression; Regressionsanalyse; Statistische Analyse; Gültigkeit; Beobachtung
Abstract	In Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010), the authors contrasted 2 approaches to causality. The first originated in the psychology literature and is associated with work by Campbell (e.g., Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002), and the second has its roots in the statistics literature and is associated with work by Rubin (e.g., Rubin, 2006). In this article, I discuss some of the issues raised by Shadish and by West and Thoemmes. I focus mostly on the impact the 2 approaches have had on research in a 3rd field, economics. In economics, the ideas of both Campbell and Rubin have been very influential, with some of the methods they developed now routinely taught in graduate programs and routinely used in empirical work and other methods receiving much less attention. At the same time, economists have added to the understanding of these methods and through these extensions have further improved researchers' ability to draw causal inferences in observational studies. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10