Factors Influencing Knowledge Creation and Innovation in an Organisation

Autor/inn/en	Merx-Chermin, Mireille; Nijhof, Wim, J.
Titel	Factors Influencing Knowledge Creation and Innovation in an Organisation
Quelle	In: Journal of European Industrial Training, 29 (2005) 2, S.135-147 (13 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0309-0590
DOI	10.1108/03090590510585091
Schlagwörter	Learning Strategies; Innovation; Foreign Countries; Performance Factors; Work Environment; Knowledge Management; Critical Thinking; Case Studies; Theory Practice Relationship; Qualitative Research; Statistical Surveys; Learning Processes; Netherlands + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Learning methode; Learning techniques; Lernmethode; Lernstrategie; Ausland; Leistungsindikator; Arbeitsmilieu; Wissensmanagement; Kritisches Denken; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Theorie-Praxis-Beziehung; Qualitative Forschung; Statistische Erhebung; Learning process; Lernprozess; Niederlande
Abstract	Purpose: The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of the factors that influence the innovative power of organisations. The concept of innovation and innovative power was examined by analysing the relationship between the construct of the learning organisation, knowledge organisation and innovative organisation, and has resulted in an innovation process model. This model consists of three processes: knowledge creation, innovation and learning to learn. The factors that might influence this cycle are: added value for stakeholders, leadership, climate, structure and strategic alignment. Design/methodology/approach: This is an exploratory study that was conducted at Oce Technologies in The Netherlands. The case study consisted of a qualitative and a quantitative stage and comprised a selection of two innovation projects separated in time. The purpose of the first phase was to collect information about the innovation spiral, through interviews with members of three divisions in each innovation process. After this, a survey was designed and sent to all employees and managers of the three divisions involved in the two innovation cases. Findings: On the basis of a data analysis, factors explaining variance in terms of innovation, learning and knowledge creation were identified. If innovation is discontinuous, the innovation spiral is not valid; if innovation has a strength in critical reflection on cases from the past to mould the future, the model has some explanatory power. Research limitations/implications: Using a survey technique to retrieve data from a current innovation experiment has a set of possible risks like maturation, forgetting, selection and a different context. Reflection and reconstruction, however, are the only possible means to achieve this. A case study does not guarantee generalisation of results. Originality/value: By studying the model and the factors that can influence them, organisations understand that it is necessary to integrate their initiatives in organisational learning, knowledge creation and innovation for the benefit of the organisation, to find a better way to adjust to discontinuous change and finally gain innovative power. (Contains 4 tables and 1 figure.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald. 875 Massachusetts Avenue 7th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139. Tel: 888-622-0075; Fax: 617-354-6875; e-mail: america@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: www.emeraldinsight.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10