An Integrated Test of Multidimensionality, Convergent, Discriminant and Criterion Validity of the Course Experience Questionnaire: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling

Autor/inn/en	Cano, Francisco; Pichardo, M. C.; Berbén, A. B. G.; Fernández-Cabezas, M.
Titel	An Integrated Test of Multidimensionality, Convergent, Discriminant and Criterion Validity of the Course Experience Questionnaire: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling
Quelle	In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46 (2021) 2, S.256-268 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0260-2938
DOI	10.1080/02602938.2020.1771278
Schlagwörter	Questionnaires; Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance; Test Validity; Structural Equation Models; Construct Validity; Undergraduate Students + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Fragebogen; Testvalidität
Abstract	Most research on the course experience questionnaire (CEQ) has been conducted through conventional exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within the independent cluster model framework (ICM-CFA). However, very few studies have focused on examining its multidimensionality using more flexible psychometric frameworks such as exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM). This study aims to conduct an integrated test of multidimensionality on the short, 23-item version of the CEQ (CEQ23) by using ESEM, to test its construct and criterion-related validity and contribute to the current debate on its validity. The participants comprised 620 undergraduate psychology students. CEQ23 scores were examined through ESEM to identify two sources of construct-multidimensionality. This entailed contrasting ICM-CFA and ESEM solutions and comparing three alternative models. Construct and criterion-related validity were then analysed using common and emerging techniques. The results (a) confirmed the presence of a superior construct: students' perceptions of teaching quality, which is multifaceted and hierarchically structured; (b) supported a generally acceptable construct and criterion-related validity; and (c) highlighted some methodological weaknesses of conventional statistical techniques, which may underly the debate on the validity of the CEQ23. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01