End It, Don't Mend It: What to Do with No Child Left Behind. Policy Analysis. No. 599

Autor/inn/en	McCluskey, Neal; Coulson, Andrew J.
Institution	Cato Institute
Titel	End It, Don't Mend It: What to Do with No Child Left Behind. Policy Analysis. No. 599
Quelle	(2007), (20 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Legislation; Policy Analysis; Federal Government; Educational Policy; National Standards; Educational Legislation; Accountability; Educational Improvement; Program Effectiveness; Constitutional Law; Government Role; School Choice; National Competency Tests; National Assessment of Educational Progress + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bundesrecht; Politikfeldanalyse; Bundesregierung; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Bildungsrecht; Schulgesetz; Verantwortung; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Staatsrecht; Choice of school; Schulwahl
Abstract	The looming expiration of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) has prompted a flood of commission reports, studies, and punditry. Virtually all of those analyses have assumed that the law should and will be reauthorized, disagreeing only over how it should be revised. They have accepted the law's premises without argument: that government-imposed standards and bureaucratic "accountability" are effective mechanisms for improving American education and that Congress should be involved in their implementation. In this paper, the authors put those preconceptions under a microscope and subject NCLB to a thorough review. They explore its effectiveness to date and ask whether its core principles are sound. They find that No Child Left Behind has been ineffective in achieving its intended goals, has had negative unintended consequences, is incompatible with policies that do work, is at the mercy of a political process that can only worsen its prospects, and is based on premises that are fundamentally flawed. They further conclude that NCLB oversteps the federal government's constitutional limits--treading on a responsibility that, by law and tradition, is reserved to the states and the people. The authors therefore recommend that NCLB not be reauthorized and that the federal government return to its constitutional bounds by ending its involvement in elementary and secondary education. Studies of Private versus Government Provision of Education are appended. (Contains 5 figures and 51 notes.) (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Cato Institute. 1000 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20001-5403. Tel: 202-842-0200; Fax: 202-842-3490; e-mail: subscriptions@cato.org; Web site: http://www.cato.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10