Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Swartz, James D. |
|---|---|
| Titel | A Study Combining Criticism and Qualitative Research Techniques for Appraising Classroom Media. |
| Quelle | (1993), (22 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
| Schlagwörter | Classroom Research; Criticism; Educational Assessment; Educational Media; Educational Research; Educational Technology; Evaluation Methods; Junior High School Students; Junior High Schools; Media Selection; Naturalistic Observation; Qualitative Research |
| Abstract | Qualitative criticism is a method of understanding things, actions, and events within a social framework. It is a method of acquiring knowledge to guide decision making based on local knowledge and a synthesis of principles from criticism and qualitative research. The function of qualitative criticism is centered with Richard Rorty's theoretical framework of solidarity. The basic principles of criticism, qualitative research, and qualitative criticism are outlined. The contributions of qualitative criticism have been and will continue to be vital to the study of education. The distinction between qualitative criticism and qualitative research is in the intent and extent of the inquiry, but both share common assumptions with naturalistic inquiry. Qualitative criticism in education intends to describe, interpret, and evaluate instruction. Its functions are described in terms of the axioms of naturalistic inquiry defined by Y. Lincoln and E. Guba. The difference between criticism and qualitative criticism is in the emphasis on naturalistic inquiry. The larger framework of Rorty's concept of solidarity and the viewpoint of George Herbert Mead for understanding social interaction are described. The use of qualitative criticism in an educational study is illustrated through a preliminary study of teacher selection of instructional media that considered the preferences of junior high school students. A study of how teachers use qualitative criticism is in progress. One table contrasts positivist and naturalist axioms. (SLD) |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
