Report of State Level Activities: Guidelines for the RFP Process and Selected Technical Issues in Large-Scale Assessment Programs. Report of State Level Activities. Project: Monitoring the Implementation of Testing and Evaluation Innovations.

Autor/inn/en	Baker, Eva L.; und weitere
Institution	Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles, CA.; Arizona State Univ., Tempe.; California Univ., Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation.; Colorado Univ., Boulder.; National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL.
Titel	Report of State Level Activities: Guidelines for the RFP Process and Selected Technical Issues in Large-Scale Assessment Programs. Report of State Level Activities. Project: Monitoring the Implementation of Testing and Evaluation Innovations.
Quelle	(1987), (81 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Leitfaden; Administrative Policy; Contracts; Educational Assessment; Educational Finance; Educational Innovation; Evaluation Methods; State Programs; Test Construction; Testing Programs + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Vertrag; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Bildungsfonds; Instructional innovation; Bildungsinnovation; Regierungsprogramm; Testaufbau
Abstract	Guidelines for evaluating responses to requests for proposals (RFPs) for state-level educational assessment programs are presented. The guidelines articulate key choice points, options, and considerations by state (and district) testing directors as they solicit services for large-scale assessment from commercial testing companies. Focus is on broadening the scope of issues and concerns that state and district testing officers consider in preparing RFPs for large-scale testing programs. Components that must be considered in dealing with the RFP process include: (1) planning approaches; (2) communications with bidders; (3) the RFP structure; (4) the review process; and (5) issues associated with equating portions of RFPs, item bias portions of RFPs, and content validity portions of RFPs. (TJH)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC