Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Katai, Zoltan |
---|---|
Titel | Promoting Computational Thinking of Both Sciences- and Humanities-Oriented Students: An Instructional and Motivational Design Perspective |
Quelle | In: Educational Technology Research and Development, 68 (2020) 5, S.2239-2261 (23 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1042-1629 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11423-020-09766-5 |
Schlagwörter | Computation; Thinking Skills; Intellectual Disciplines; Instructional Design; Student Motivation; Electronic Learning; Educational Environment; Instructional Effectiveness; Learning Processes |
Abstract | We proposed to investigate whether properly calibrated e-learning environments can efficiently promote computational thinking of both sciences- and humanities-oriented people. We invited two groups of students (sciences- vs. humanities-oriented members) to participate in a six-stage learning session: to watch a folk-dance illustration (s1) and an animation (s2) of the bubble-sort algorithm; to reconstruct the algorithm on the same input (s3); to orchestrate the algorithm on a random input stored in a white(s4)/black(s5) array (visible/invisible sequence) and to watch a parallel simulation of several sorting algorithms as they work side-by-side on different color-scale bars (s6). To assess the current motivation of students we created nine specific questionnaires (Q1-9). The experiment we conducted included the following task sequence: Q1-2, s1, Q3, s2, Q4, s3, Q5, s4, Q6, s5, Q7, s6, Q8-9. We focused on assessing the motivational contributions of the generated (situational factors) emotions, challenge and active involvement during the e-learning experience. Research results revealed that there are no unbridgeable differences in the way these two groups relate to e-learning processes that aim to promote computational thinking. Although sciences-oriented students' motivational-scores were consistently superior to their humanities-oriented colleagues, there was strong correlation between them; furthermore, differences diminished as both groups advanced with their learning tasks. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |