Triangulation 2.0

Autor/in	Denzin, Norman K.
Titel	Triangulation 2.0
Quelle	In: Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6 (2012) 2, S.80-88 (9 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1558-6898
DOI	10.1177/1558689812437186
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Social Justice; Qualitative Research; Research Methodology; Inquiry; Democracy; Mixed Methods Research; Research Design; Pragmatics; Political Issues + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Soziale Gerechtigkeit; Qualitative Forschung; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Demokratie; Forschungsdesign; Pragmalinguistik; Politischer Faktor
Abstract	The author's thesis is simple and direct. Those in the mixed methods qualitative inquiry community need a new story line, one that does not confuse pragmatism for triangulation, and triangulation for mixed methods research (MMR). A different third way is required, one that inspires generative politics and dialogic democracy and helps shape realistic utopian dreams. This is a third path based on interpretive methodologies that show citizens how to confront the obstacles to justice that shape their daily lives. Mixed methods can and should be used in the service of transformative social justice projects. Looking inward, the mixed methods discourse needs a narrative that does not stumble over words such as "politics," "pragmatism," "paradigm," "third moment," "methodology," and "triangulation." A way out of the present is needed. In this article, the author proposes a third way of conceptualizing MMR, one based on critical interpretive methodologies. (Contains 7 notes.) (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10