Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Vamos, Cheryl A.; Thompson, Erika L.; Logan, Rachel G.; Griner, Stacey B.; Perrin, Karen M.; Merrell, Laura K.; Daley, Ellen M. |
---|---|
Titel | Exploring College Students' Sexual and Reproductive Health Literacy |
Quelle | In: Journal of American College Health, 68 (2020) 1, S.79-88 (10 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Vamos, Cheryl A.) ORCID (Thompson, Erika L.) ORCID (Logan, Rachel G.) ORCID (Griner, Stacey B.) ORCID (Merrell, Laura K.) ORCID (Daley, Ellen M.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0744-8481 |
DOI | 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515757 |
Schlagwörter | College Students; Literacy; Sexuality; Health Behavior; Grounded Theory; Contraception; Student Attitudes; Patients; Intervention; Health Services; Prevention; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Information Sources; Barriers; Language Usage; Life Style; Correlation; Trust (Psychology); Access to Information; Visual Aids; Symptoms (Individual Disorders); Peer Relationship; Information Technology; Pregnancy; Student Characteristics; Florida Collegestudent; Alphabetisierung; Schreib- und Lesefähigkeit; Sexualität; Health behaviour; Gesundheitsverhalten; Empfängnisverhütung; Schülerverhalten; Patient; Health service; Gesundheitsdienst; Gesundheitswesen; Prävention; Vorbeugung; Sexual transmitted disease; Geschlechtskrankheit; Information source; Informationsquelle; Sprachgebrauch; Lebensstil; Korrelation; Anschauungsmaterial; Psychiatrische Symptomatik; Peer-Beziehungen; Informationstechnologie; Schwangerschaft |
Abstract | Objective: To assess college students' sexual and reproductive health (SRH) literacy experiences, specific to contraception use and STI prevention. Participants: In Spring 2015, participants (n = 43) from a large institution participated in six focus groups (two male and four females groups). Methods: Focus groups were guided by the health literacy domains (access; understand; appraise; apply); data were analyzed in MaxQDA using the constant comparative method. Results: The Internet was the most commonly "accessed" source for SRH information. Participants discussed facilitators (eg, use of visuals) and barriers (eg, medical jargon) to "understanding" information; and personal lifestyle, advice from family/friends, symptoms, and sexual partners as "appraisal" factors. Participants "applied" information by communicating with friends/providers and seeking healthcare. However, findings were not linear nor mutually exclusive, representing the interaction of health literacy skills. Conclusion: Findings suggest that a patient-centered intervention capitalizing on technology and trusted individuals (providers/peer educators) may facilitate college students' SRH literacy. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |